Thinking Out Loud - Ms. Green

Commentaries from a female, conservative Christian worldview. Intermittent observations on human behavior and current events. Occasional bursts of personal tirades,confessions, and discoveries. Frequent discussions about my "Narrow-Minded Faith".

<< Back to Main Page

Friday, November 30, 2007

Mark was Right

One of my friends, Mark, recently remarked about American liberal women always being on the side of Islamofacism. He was ridiculed by another visitor to my blog.

After my post, Another Islamic Law Story,Mark commented:

And this is the kind of thing American Liberal Women support when they protest the war on Islamo-fascism."

To which another reader said: You are 'twisting' the facts here. American Liberal women are NOT suporting these sheria laws. (If you are honest, show me where they said such things!!)


Well, here’s a perfect example of just what Mark was referring to.

Mark is right on the money. Liberals would rather defend extremist Muslim behavior than support a Conservative in office.

Liberals are collectively losing it.

Postscript: Just in case you missed it a few days ago, here is another story about the Religion of Peace. It’s not for the queasy.

Crime and Punishment in Islam

Labels:

Continue reading..

9 Comments:

At 9:23 PM, Blogger ELAshley said...

From UK's The Sun:

Mob bay for teacher's death

"TERRIFIED teddy bear row teacher Gillian Gibbons was being held in a secret jail last night — after a 10,000-strong armed mob took to Sudan’s streets screaming: “Kill her, kill her.”

The Liverpool mum of two — convicted of insulting Islam by calling the bear Mohammed — was sneaked out of the capital Khartoum hours after being jailed for 15 days.

Fanatics demanding her execution by firing squad streamed out of mosques after prayers — grabbing machetes, knives and clubs. The hate-filled protesters — whipped into a frenzy by religious leaders...

Hundreds of riot police refused to intervene...

She was jailed even though the bear, used in a project on animals, was named by her PUPILS after one of their classmates."

 
At 7:27 AM, Blogger Mark said...

Thanks for the hat tip. Specifically, I was referring to the deafening silence of NOW, NARAL,and all those other Liberal women's organizations that scream bloody murder if we indicate we would like the murder of babies to stop, but when women are oppressed in the name of Islam, they say nothing. If that isn't tacitly supporting Islamo-fascism, I don't know what you'd call it.

 
At 8:11 AM, Anonymous American said...

I don't watch 'View'. I read the link you provided. Again, I didn't see them 'supporting' the sheria law. They wanted Americans to be aware of local cultures. If not, you can put yourself in a dangerous situation. That was their point (well, based on the partial script I read).

We have seen such incidents again and again. Journalists getting killed in war zones, students getting murdered, travellers getting jailed etc. One should know what they are getting into before visiting or living in such places.

AGain, show me a link where women's group are clearly 'supporting' the sheria law!

 
At 4:11 PM, Blogger Ms.Green said...

If a woman is dressed immodestly, and is then brutally raped, is it all her fault?

If a child runs into the street abruptly and is killed by a drunk driver who was speeding through the neighborhood, is it all the child’s fault?

If a person of one ethnicity drives through a neighborhood of another ethnicity late at night, and is consequently attached at a traffic light, beaten, and left for dead, is it just their fault?

According to your logic, the answer to all three questions above is “yes”.

Those on The View spent their words criticizing and questioning the woman’s ignorance of Muslim law and culture, not condemning the Sharia Law that would have this women flogged or even hung.

So by focusing only on the ignorance of the victim (yes, she is a victim, however naive she may be), these liberal women are condoning what happens to her, just as a “yes” answer to my first three questions would also be condoning the rapist, the drunk driver, and the murderers I mentioned above.

Not unlike what many in Germany did during WWII. They just looked the other way. Thus they were indirectly condoning the Holocaust.

Cindy Sheehan, in an interview on CBS, referred to terrorists as “freedom fighters”.

Nancy Pelosi, in a statement about the Iraqi war, called the terrorists “freedom fighters.”

Have you forgotten Pelosi’s unauthorized visit with the Syrian President during a time of war – when Syria is a major funder and a country that harbors terrorists?

Rosie O’Donnell: said don’t be afraid of terrorists – they’re “mothers and fathers”. She went on to say the Fundamentalist Christians were the ones to be feared.

When liberal women like Pelosi and others publically call our troops baby killers, blame terrorism on George Bush, and schmooze with the other side, regardless of what they say their motives are, they are aiding and abetting , and yes they are condoning the enemy.
The enemy is Islamofacism and the law of Islamofacism is called Sharia Law.

Thus, Mark was right.

 
At 4:11 PM, Blogger Ms.Green said...

If a woman is dressed immodestly, and is then brutally raped, is it all her fault?

If a child runs into the street abruptly and is killed by a drunk driver who was speeding through the neighborhood, is it all the child’s fault?

If a person of one ethnicity drives through a neighborhood of another ethnicity late at night, and is consequently attached at a traffic light, beaten, and left for dead, is it just their fault?

According to your logic, the answer to all three questions above is “yes”.

Those on The View spent their words criticizing and questioning the woman’s ignorance of Muslim law and culture, not condemning the Sharia Law that would have this women flogged or even hung.

So by focusing only on the ignorance of the victim (yes, she is a victim, however naive she may be), these liberal women are condoning what happens to her, just as a “yes” answer to my first three questions would also be condoning the rapist, the drunk driver, and the murderers I mentioned above.

Not unlike what many in Germany did during WWII. They just looked the other way. Thus they were indirectly condoning the Holocaust.

Cindy Sheehan, in an interview on CBS, referred to terrorists as “freedom fighters”.

Nancy Pelosi, in a statement about the Iraqi war, called the terrorists “freedom fighters.”

Have you forgotten Pelosi’s unauthorized visit with the Syrian President during a time of war – when Syria is a major funder and a country that harbors terrorists?

Rosie O’Donnell: said don’t be afraid of terrorists – they’re “mothers and fathers”. She went on to say the Fundamentalist Christians were the ones to be feared.

When liberal women like Pelosi and others publically call our troops baby killers, blame terrorism on George Bush, and schmooze with the other side, regardless of what they say their motives are, they are aiding and abetting , and yes they are condoning the enemy.
The enemy is Islamofacism and the law of Islamofacism is called Sharia Law.

Thus, Mark was right.

 
At 12:04 AM, Blogger Al-Ozarka said...

I think Whoopi's got another motive for referring to all Americans as "ugly-Americans", don't you? (:

 
At 7:40 PM, Anonymous American said...

Answer to your what-if scenarios...No, No and No. No - it's not all of their fault! But, we need to be careful while dealing with dangerous situation. In a safe area, I would let my kid play outside. In a bad area, I probably wouldn't even sit outside my house. I might get hit by a stray bullet!!

By advocating safer choices, I don;t see how I am 'supporting' the bad guys!! I don't think any 'sane' person will support bad guys. The radicals in sudan are obviously very backward morons.

As to Cindy Sheehan's 'freedom fighter' comment: Well, you are opening a big topic here!! (For the record, I am opposed to her statement) It's the bad karma catching up with our nation. We have gone around the waorld many times calling real terrorists 'freedom fighters' in the past. Did you forget it ? Did you forget how American called the very same filthy mujahidins from Afghanistan the 'fredom fighters' and provided them the support in terms of money, training and weapons? There are books written on this subject and they detail how CIA operatives used to stay in Quetta (Pakistan) and handle all the logistics and planning. Who supplied the stinger missiles to Taliban fighters? Who called chechniya terrorists 'fredom fighters' and lectured Russia on human rights? Who called Kashir terrorists a 'freedom fighters/insurgents' and lectured india on humanrights and importance of dialogue? Who supported the very Saddam Hussain giving him logistic support? Why America is still dealing with PKK, a known terrorist group?

So...you may want to be little careful before blaming Cindy Shehan. In my opinion, she just stole a page from American foreign policy's dirty tricks.

Oh, well - there are so many things I need to write. Well, I am sure there would be plenty of opportunities ....

 
At 9:45 PM, Blogger Ms.Green said...

"By advocating safer choices, I don;t see how I am 'supporting' the bad guys!! I don't think any 'sane' person will support bad guys"

The gals on The View were not advocating safer choices. They chose to ridicule the woman instead of focusing on the total lunacy of a religion that would hang or beat a woman for naming a stuffed toy Mohammed.

"As to Cindy Sheehan's 'freedom fighter' comment"

You are missing the point. I was listing examples of what Mark said to begin with, that liberal women in this country, by their words and actions, are supporting terrorism. Don't try to steer away from the main topic with smoke and mirrors.

As for US foreign policy, if you don't understand the necessity to lend support at different times to those who would normally be our enemy in order to stabilize a region, you don't understand how the real world works. That has absolutely nothing to do with people like Pelosi, Sheehan, O'Donnell and others lending credibility and support to the terrorists. Why do you think the terrorists were so elated when the Democrats came out on top in the last election?

 
At 7:34 PM, Anonymous American said...

"Why do you think the terrorists were so elated when the Democrats came out on top in the last election?"

Simple. They knew the agenda of democrats - to get out of the Iraq. I don't see how it makes liberals the 'supporters of terrorists'!! Going by the same standards, are you going to call George Bush a 'supporter of terrorism'? Because, he doesn't talk about saudi system. Instead, he invites them for private dinner!!

As to your answer on foregin policy: People like should be ashamed of yourself. If you see a snake in your neighbor's backyard, you better kill it. Because, it's going to come to your backyard tomorrow and bite your kid. That's exactly what happened on 9/11. Our flawed foreign policies and double standards came back to bite us. If we had a real policy, the taliban/Bin Laden wouldn't have existed. Shame on you!! Take a good look at 9/11 attack videos...take a look at 3870 soldiers killed in Iraq....Shame on you!! I've no respect for those who have no respect for human lives and think everything is some type of political game!!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home